Poker: The alternative to earn money
After analyzing various casino games, look for chances to win at Blackjack, Roulette program some simulators, etc., I gave up. You can not win money playing in the casino, you always lose.
Alternative: Poker. Last spring
I started playing poker with my friends, and I had a vice. Initially losing money, a lot, but it took some time to put myself at their level to be the most balanced games. We never played much, the total amount we each never exceeds what may cost us a dinner at a normal restaurant.
This summer I was in the U.S. and discovered the widespread hobby that Americans have a particular variant, the Hold'em Poker. A variant is very easy to understand, learn and play in rookie plan, but very complex if one wants to start playing professionally. In the U.S. championships televised Hold'em Poker: regional and global end World Poker Tour, a program Celebrity Poker where famous play, etc.
In between announcing, among others, the Party Poker , web to which I connected, I downloaded the software and started playing with funny money 'Play Money'.
By October or so and played quite well. Lying made money steadily. I had my excel with my stats and weekly earnings were substantial, with growth consistently above 100%. I thought I was capable of doubling the money invested weekly with some ease. Also, I thought, here you do not play against the house, here you play against other people. Are you better than them, but the bank is left with a percentage of boat on each bet, you make money.
So I started to play with real money, real money, euros.
soon tell you more.
Monday, January 30, 2006
Thursday, January 26, 2006
Ways To Get Rid Of A Stiff Neck
Roulette: Roulette
One can mount a complex martingale everything you want, I rode a few and I played with them at the Online Casino and Casino Tropez (the latter can play offline). First
explain how it develops the martingale, then the entire show. Martingale that I will explain is always winning, but you can create a little more conservative in that neither gain nor lose any of the plays. Suppose
French roulette minimum bet as a row (this are three numbers) is 1, and the maximum bet of 100. From my point of view this is an optimal martingale and also easy to remember, because it minimizes losses and gives a lot of play. But in the end is lost, is mathematical. It's fun to play in small series.
If you bet 1 to a row and you win, the bank gives us 11 more chips, so it would withdraw 12 of the table. The probability of winning is 3 / 37 in French Roulette. The losing is 34/37 = 91.892%
The table below takes these 4 columns: Quantity
I bet ...
If I lose, my loss is cumulative ...
If I win, removal of the table ...
Probability of not winning ...
That is, if I can bet 1 lose 1, and if I lose, what I do in the next bet? Bet 1, because if I win, I win 12, much greater than 1.
so you can calculate the benefit in each row by subtracting the cumulative loss that left the table. Developing
completely
martingale:
If you look, when I have lost 11 times in a row, the next time I bet 2, so that if I win, I win something.
As you can see, this martingale gives much more play than betting on red or black, the probability of losing everything is smaller (this is 0.681%), and the average profit (6.413) for every time I make it juicier. The drawback is that it requires more money in your pocket to be able to play: 1119 chips. In any case, also lost in this martingale.
Probability of losing x amount lost = 0.00681 x 1119 = 6.9154 x Probability of winning
average profit = (1-.00681) x 6.413 = 6.3693
The martingale complete red or black is:
The probability of losing everything is 0'942%, is lost before and the way to lose is more boring. In this other
martingale: Probability of losing
x amount lost = 0.00942 x 127 = 1.1963 x Probability of winning
average profit = (1-.00942) x 1 = 0.9905
As you see, is also lost. Suppose
One can mount a complex martingale everything you want, I rode a few and I played with them at the Online Casino and Casino Tropez (the latter can play offline). First
explain how it develops the martingale, then the entire show. Martingale that I will explain is always winning, but you can create a little more conservative in that neither gain nor lose any of the plays. Suppose
French roulette minimum bet as a row (this are three numbers) is 1, and the maximum bet of 100. From my point of view this is an optimal martingale and also easy to remember, because it minimizes losses and gives a lot of play. But in the end is lost, is mathematical. It's fun to play in small series.
If you bet 1 to a row and you win, the bank gives us 11 more chips, so it would withdraw 12 of the table. The probability of winning is 3 / 37 in French Roulette. The losing is 34/37 = 91.892%
The table below takes these 4 columns: Quantity
I bet ...
If I lose, my loss is cumulative ...
If I win, removal of the table ...
Probability of not winning ...
| 1 | 1 91.892% 12 | ||
| | 1 2 | 84.441% 12 |
That is, if I can bet 1 lose 1, and if I lose, what I do in the next bet? Bet 1, because if I win, I win 12, much greater than 1.
so you can calculate the benefit in each row by subtracting the cumulative loss that left the table. Developing
completely
martingale:
| 1. | 1 | 12 | 91,892% |
| 1. | 2 | 12 | 84,441% |
| 1. | 3 | 12 | 77,595% |
| 1. | 4 | 12 | 71,303% |
| 1. | 5 | 12 | 65,522% |
| 1. | 6 | 12 | 60,209% |
| 1. | 7 | 12 | 55,327% |
| 1. | 8 | 12 | 50,841% |
| 1. | 9 | 12 | 46,719% |
| 1. | 10 | 12 | 42,931% |
| 1. | 11 | 12 | 39,450% |
| 2. | 13 | 24 | 36,252% |
| 2. | 15 | 24 | 33,312% |
| 2. | 17 | 24 | 30,611% |
| 2. | 19 | 24 | 28,129% |
| 2. | 21 | 24 | 25,848% |
| 2. | 23 | 24 | 23,753% |
| 3. | 26 | 36 | 21,827% |
| 3. | 29 | 36 | 20,057% |
| 3. | 32 | 36 | 18,431% |
| 3. | 35 | 36 | 16,936% |
| 4. | 39 | 48 | 15,563% |
| 4. | 43 | 48 | 14,301% |
| 4. | 47 | 48 | 13,142% |
| 5. | 52 | 60 | 12,076% |
| 5. | 57 | 60 | 11,097% |
| 6. | 63 | 72 | 10,197% |
| 6. | 69 | 72 | 9,370% |
| 7. | 76 | 84 | 8,611% |
| 7. | 83 | 84 | 7,913% |
| 8. | 91 | 96 | 7,271% |
| 9. | 100 | 108 | 6,681% |
| 10. | 110 | 120 | 6,140% |
| 11. | 121 | 132 | 5,642% |
| 12. | 133 | 144 | 5,184% |
| 13. | 146 | 156 | 4,764% |
| 14. | 160 | 168 | 4,378% |
| 15. | 175 | 180 | 4,023% |
| 16. | 191 | 192 | 3,697% |
| 18. | 209 | 216 | 3,397% |
| 20. | 229 | 240 | 3,122% |
| 21. | 250 | 252 | 2,868% |
| 23. | 273 | 276 | 2,636% |
| 25. | 298 | 300 | 2,422% |
| 28. | 326 | 336 | 2,226% |
| 30. | 356 | 360 | 2,045% |
| 33. | 389 | 396 | 1,879% |
| 36. | 425 | 432 | 1,727% |
| 39. | 464. | 468 | 1,587% |
| 43. | 507. | 516 | 1,458% |
| 47. | 554. | 564 | 1,340% |
| 51. | 605. | 612 | 1,231% |
| 56. | 661 | 672 | 1,132% |
| 61. | 722. | 732 | 1,040% |
| 66. | 788. | 792 | 0,956% |
| 72. | 860. | 864 | 0,878% |
| 79. | 939. | 948 | 0,807% |
| 86. | 1025. | 1032 | 0,741% |
| 94. | 1119. | 1128 0.681% | |
| 102. | 1221. | 1224 0.626% |
If you look, when I have lost 11 times in a row, the next time I bet 2, so that if I win, I win something.
As you can see, this martingale gives much more play than betting on red or black, the probability of losing everything is smaller (this is 0.681%), and the average profit (6.413) for every time I make it juicier. The drawback is that it requires more money in your pocket to be able to play: 1119 chips. In any case, also lost in this martingale.
Probability of losing x amount lost = 0.00681 x 1119 = 6.9154 x Probability of winning
average profit = (1-.00681) x 6.413 = 6.3693
The martingale complete red or black is:
| 1 1 2 | 51.351% | ||
| 2 3 4 | 26.370% 4 | ||
| 7 8 | 13.541%|||
| 8 | 15 | 6.954% 16 | |
| 16 31 32 | 3.571% | ||
| 32 63 64 | 1.834% 64 | ||
| 127 128 0.942% | |||
| 128 256 255 | 0.484% |
The probability of losing everything is 0'942%, is lost before and the way to lose is more boring. In this other
martingale: Probability of losing
x amount lost = 0.00942 x 127 = 1.1963 x Probability of winning
average profit = (1-.00942) x 1 = 0.9905
As you see, is also lost. Suppose
Tuesday, January 24, 2006
Pokemon Emerald Shinie Farm
Martingales more complex: I can win? My hobby
roulette ideal. An ideal wheel is one in which all numbers are equally likely to leave. That
Roulette is unbeatable. Again, UNBEATABLE. There is no method that can make you earn money.
In finite series of bets, that is, that you put in front of the wheel and play a bit, you can earn some money, or at least lose with some slow and have fun on the road. The more you play, the more natural to lose money.
People states that there are ways to win at roulette. Do not pay any attention, is FALSE. The typical example is a simple martingale probability 50%. Martingale
simple:
Bet 1 to something that is likely almost 1 / 2 to occur (red or black, for example).
If you lose you double (2).
If you lose you double (4).
...
If you lose you double (infinite).
could be so on to infinity. That way when you win, something would happen sooner or later, would earn 1.
Example:
Bet 1 to red and you lose (accumulated losses: 1)
Bet 2 to red and you lose (loss Accumulated: 2 +1 = 3)
Bet 4 to red and you lose (accumulated losses: 4 +3 = 7)
Bet 8 to red and desire (earnings: 8-7 = 1)
Overall
Another would earn 1
way to see is that in each successive bet betting everything you have already lost more than one, and another way to look is the amount needed to bet that if you win the next bet if net balance is positive (this gives us clues to make martingales more sophisticated).
red
The probability is 1 / 2, 18/37 at roulette is French, and 18/38 in American roulette. French Roulette has a zero, American 2. If you want to play, do it in French Roulette.
Casinos bet limit tables that can not be made infinite martingale. When you reach the limit of the martingale loses everything.
Example:
table limits: minimum 1, maximum 100
bet 1 and lose.
bet 2 and lose.
bet 4 and lost.
bet 8 and lost.
bet 16 and lose.
bet 32 \u200b\u200band lose.
bet 64 and lose.
I can not bet 128 and I'm 127!
multiplicáis
If the probability to lose through losses and profits are earned by you will see that you lose more than it earns. Martingales
NOT WORK. In another moment I will explain other more sophisticated martingales allow fun one more time, but fail like this.
If you find any online method that says that works, you command me and I will show it does not work, except one who'll tell you another day, but requires that roulette is not perfect, and this is impossible in online casinos.
Roulette is unbeatable. Again, UNBEATABLE. There is no method that can make you earn money.
In finite series of bets, that is, that you put in front of the wheel and play a bit, you can earn some money, or at least lose with some slow and have fun on the road. The more you play, the more natural to lose money.
People states that there are ways to win at roulette. Do not pay any attention, is FALSE. The typical example is a simple martingale probability 50%. Martingale
simple:
Bet 1 to something that is likely almost 1 / 2 to occur (red or black, for example).
If you lose you double (2).
If you lose you double (4).
...
If you lose you double (infinite).
could be so on to infinity. That way when you win, something would happen sooner or later, would earn 1.
Example:
Bet 1 to red and you lose (accumulated losses: 1)
Bet 2 to red and you lose (loss Accumulated: 2 +1 = 3)
Bet 4 to red and you lose (accumulated losses: 4 +3 = 7)
Bet 8 to red and desire (earnings: 8-7 = 1)
Overall
Another would earn 1
way to see is that in each successive bet betting everything you have already lost more than one, and another way to look is the amount needed to bet that if you win the next bet if net balance is positive (this gives us clues to make martingales more sophisticated).
red
The probability is 1 / 2, 18/37 at roulette is French, and 18/38 in American roulette. French Roulette has a zero, American 2. If you want to play, do it in French Roulette.
Casinos bet limit tables that can not be made infinite martingale. When you reach the limit of the martingale loses everything.
Example:
table limits: minimum 1, maximum 100
bet 1 and lose.
bet 2 and lose.
bet 4 and lost.
bet 8 and lost.
bet 16 and lose.
bet 32 \u200b\u200band lose.
bet 64 and lose.
I can not bet 128 and I'm 127!
multiplicáis
If the probability to lose through losses and profits are earned by you will see that you lose more than it earns. Martingales
NOT WORK. In another moment I will explain other more sophisticated martingales allow fun one more time, but fail like this.
If you find any online method that says that works, you command me and I will show it does not work, except one who'll tell you another day, but requires that roulette is not perfect, and this is impossible in online casinos.
6 Days Late Checked Cervix
My love casino games is long. 7 years that I will for the first time in a casino, and handed me the worst. I went with 5,000 pesetas (about 30 €) and left the casino with double the money. I also had had a great time gambling and feeling the emotion of what will happen, "win or lose? Exciting.
As appeared online casinos offline versions I downloaded from various casinos and spent hours playing that always failed testing strategies in the long run, as predicted by the mathematical formulas. Simulators did implement more complex, sophisticated martingale, but nothing, unsuccessfully.
In this blog, I share with the utmost rigor all my experiences with the game, all my knowledge. My thing with the game is almost an obsession at this point, do not talk about gambling because gambling is not just money, but spend time trying to break the chance for my convenience. The day that the formula, make money and be very happy (not for money but for winning). I do not know if it is an impossible goal, but at least it's exciting.
Welcome to my walks through the casino and mathematics.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)